Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0w5ExM-000BBnC; Thu, 13 Mar 97 12:10 CST |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 13 Mar 1997 12:20:07 -0600 |
Precedence: |
list |
Reply-To: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Thu Mar 13 13: |
03:31 1997 |
X-Status: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"S2sQC1.0.jfG.FC4Ap"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
X-Mailer: |
Mozilla 3.0Gold (Win95; I) |
Organization: |
Infinite Technologies |
Message-ID: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Visual inspection usually can't tell you for certain if a trace is
connected to the pad or not. I suggest obtaining a copy of the
schematic to be absolutely certain. If the pad is indeed a dummy pad,
then it depends upon your customers acceptance criteria. If they
require a pad to be there, many companies supply pad and trace repair
kits, such as CER-KIT which is commonly available through any
electronics manufacturing supply company. I hope this helps.
-Robert Donovan
Infinite Technologies Inc.
_____________________Reply Separator________________________
We have a pad missing, but there is no evidence of a trace leading from
this missing pad. Is this acceptable?
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|