TECHNET Archives

February 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Michael Forrester"<[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Feb 1997 15:09:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)





We are currently looking into alternatives to HASL on our PWB's.  Our
boards contain
primarily fine pitch surface mount parts with some thru-hole.  The
alternatives I have seen are
OPC (Entek Plus CU-106A), Nickel/Gold, and Electroless Palladium.   In all
of the data
the I have gathered on alternatives, I have yet to see a comparison between
the alternatives.
Does anyone have any data comparing the various alternatives or personal
experience?  I
would appreciate any input that you may have.  Thank you.

Best Regards,

Mike Forrester

Sr. Test Engineer
LeCroy Corp.
E-Mail: [log in to unmask]


***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]>   *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body.          *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2