TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Fri, 12 Jan 1996 12:40:18 -0600
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
RO
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2215
X-Sender:
TO:
Return-Path:
X-Loop:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"b-Fdu3.0.exA.fegzm"@ipc>
Subject:
From [log in to unmask] Fri Jan 12 14:
08:42 1996
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0taoKx-0000NxC; Fri, 12 Jan 96 12:36 CST
From:
Chris Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
X-Mailer:
Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.1.2
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Heurikon is a company that designs and mfg single board computers.
We have questions in relation to cleaning flux from under a BGA and how can we 
establish a solid test process for assurance of not only a good functional
board 
but a reliable solder joint on the BGA.  Heurikon presently  uses a water
based flux. 
Do we have to go to a No Clean process?? Is there small test equipment that
will allow 
us to use  JTAG within the BGA.

Does anyone out there have any answer to these question or experience in
these issues??


Thanks



ATOM RSS1 RSS2