Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vcDJl-0000RYC; Mon, 23 Dec 96 10:33 CST |
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 Dec 1996 11:42:28 -0500 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7BIT |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
From [log in to unmask] Mon Dec 23 12: |
58:28 1996 |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"qEVzx2.0.AFF.SHhlo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Status: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 (WebTV 1.0) |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have seen variations between 200 and 1200 microinches by XRF.
I also know these ranges were customer driven.
Experimentally, when the XRF read anything other than 60/40, one was
off the pad, and remeasurement was necessary. Otherwise a specific
sample was faken at various locations on both sides the board and marked
as such on the report. For example, Front Left Corner - Fiducial Pad,
and so on.
I'd like to know of any HASL Surface Tolerance specifications also.
[log in to unmask]
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|