Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vaAYf-0000UGC; Tue, 17 Dec 96 19:12 CST |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 17 Dec 96 16:32:45 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"GaEdv3.0.HeO.-Iqjo"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Wed Dec 18 08: |
23:36 1996 |
X-Loop: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 17 December, James queried:
>> Could someone tell me the advantages of using Gold/NI vs HASL and
>> what are the common (if any) process problems I may encounter when
>> screening/placing parts/soldering to these type boards using
>> 63/37 eutectic solder paste? Any wave solder issues? Thanks in advance!
James,
There ain't many process problems as far as assembly goes with gold/nickle
plating. There was some concern in the past with gold because of the amount that
was plated on the pads...the gold would leech into the solder joint and could
cause the joint to be brittle, or maybe form an excessively thick intermetalic
layer. But the amount that's plated on the pads nowadays doesn't warrant the
concern that there was in the past...which also explains why the cost of gold
plating has gone down _A BUNCH_ over the past 4-5 years.
You really shouldn't have to change your process at all, although (I know
there may be some debate about this), you *MAY* want to add 2% silver and get a
SN62/PB36/2AG paste. Now I know this is just a cosmetic suggestion, but the 2%
silver _REALLY_ does make the solder joint a heck of lot "sparklier and shinier"
when soldering to gold than if you didn't use it. The solder joint from a 63/37
solder looks okay mind you, and you might not even notice anything just looking
at a 63/37 joint on a gold plated PCB by itself. But if you held another gold
plated PCB up next to it that was soldered with a 62/36/2, you would easily be
able to pick the two apart. So if you have a fetish about shiny stuff, go with
the 2% silver. Wave soldering doesn't have the same "shiny" issue because most
of the gold that does go into solution gets carried away into the wave solder
pot, unlike SMT reflow where you're dealing with a finite amount of solder on
each pad.
If anything, using gold plating will solve some problems fer' ya', such as:
1. Shelf life of yer' PCB's will be extended with a gold finish...
2. Printing solder paste will be less of a pain on yer' fine-pitch 'cause yer'
gonna' have some nice flat pads now...
3. Yer' boards will have that appearance of class now...ya' know that Tiffany's
look with the gold plating n' all? HA! HA! (just joshin' ya')
Seriously, I think it's a good move "SMT-wise" in my opinion.
Now, go just another step further and switch to OSP's...
__\/__
. / ^ _ \ .
|\| (o)(o) |/|
#------.OOOo----oo----oOOO.-----#
# Steve Gregory #
# SMT Process Engineer #
# The SMT Centre Incorporated #
# [log in to unmask] #
#________________Oooo.__________#
.oooO ( )
( ) ) /
\ ( (_/
\_)
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|