TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tZN7v-0000NoC; Mon, 8 Jan 96 13:21 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 8 Jan 96 12:27:53 MST
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
RO
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2179
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"ITY3y1.0.ue7.SwMym"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Al Slagle)
X-Loop:
From [log in to unmask] Mon Jan 8 16:
55:38 1996
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)

As a follow on question about solder paste;

If the SMT parts are glued onto the bottom side of the board, and thus are held
into place with the glue and not the paste itself, How can a proper solder
joint exist?

SMT parts on top of the board are seated down to the surface of the board by
gravity/convection.

If glue holds SMT parts, won't these back-side parts be permanetly held off
the surface of the board? and thus require a different solder-paste approach?



ATOM RSS1 RSS2