TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tkM6y-00004BC; Wed, 7 Feb 96 20:29 CST
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 7 Feb 1996 16:26:08 -0600
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2563
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"q8XD53.0.oZ8.70M6n"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Thu Feb 8 12:
34:03 1996
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
     
     Anybody have any suggestions/papers/standards...that detail or provide 
     a good outline for evaluating contract PCB assembly houses ?
     
     D.Drake



ATOM RSS1 RSS2