 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uthdf-0000LcC; Thu, 22 Aug 96 16:50 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 22 Aug 1996 16:57:27 +600 CDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Fri Aug 23 08: |
59:32 1996 |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| Priority: |
normal |
| TO: |
|
| X-Confirm-Reading-To: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"4x45N3.0.shB.EOD7o"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.23) |
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Organization: |
CompuRoute, Inc. |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Address,
We currently use Polypropylene (PP) for a majority of our chemical
solution tanks and are having excellent success and for many years.
We are currently using a double PP liner for our Permaganate Tank and
would like to change this temporary set-up. Stainless Steel is not
out of the question, but not desired now. However we are considering
a material called CoreSeal. From what I understand this is a
plastic/rubber coating that tightly seals tanks, floors, frames etc.
Does anyone have pros and cons on this material or similar products
used as liners for solution tanks? Thank you.
John Gulley
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
