 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0udh68-0000EeC; Tue, 9 Jul 96 13:01 CDT |
| Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 9 Jul 1996 11:08:39 +0400 (EDT) |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| cc: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Jul 9 18: |
32:52 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| X-Status: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"tg6Nn2.0.kXF.kvfun"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Tom, I believe the well-known expert Werner Englemaier must have some
literature on the subject. You might do a library search on his
writings. Likewise, there used to be a gentleman named Harvey Solomon at
GE Schenectady who did some very good work on solder fatige, but it was
on the more standard composition, at least to my knowledge. Lou Hart
.
On Mon, 8 Jul 1996 [log in to unmask] wrote:
> Fellow TechNetters:
>
> I need some information and I was hoping you could help me. Does anyone have
> any information on solder fatigue for tin-lead solders that have between 40 and
> 50 percent tin content? Any information or leads would be appreciated. Thanks
> in advance for any help.
>
> Tom Carroll
> Hughes Aircraft Co.
> (310) 334-4757
> [log in to unmask]
>
> The mail list is provided by IPC using SmartList v3.05
> To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:
> [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.
>
The mail list is provided by IPC using SmartList v3.05
To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:
[log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.
|
|
|
