Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uMHVe-0000D9C; Wed, 22 May 96 12:15 CDT |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 May 1996 10:11:23 -0700 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Status: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"KvP_L2.0.xp9.zkqen"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Tue Jun 4 17: |
59:28 1996 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
X-Mailer: |
Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I) |
Resent-Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Our company has been approached by an outside vendor with a process that
can be used in circuit board manufacturing that greatly reduces
vibration while maintaing stiffness in the finished board. We have been
testing this process and it looks like a promising technology, but we
would like to know if there is a market for circuit boards that resist
resonance-induced vibration before we continue with more testing.
We are looking for suggested applications where vibrations cause a
problem in the performance of the circuit board. Any suggestions or
input would be greatly appreciated.
Thank You
Brad Reese
|
|
|