TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vivian Vosburg <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Dec 1995 13:56:13 -0600 (CST)
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (39 lines)
Rich,

I had saved the message that you are refering to for my own information.
I am forwarding it to you, less the original requester e-mail. I also was 
specifically interested that the MIL-STD-105 had been canceled, and am 
curious about the ANSI/ASQC replacement. If you or anyone else out there 
have any thoughts on the differences, I'd like to hear them.

Vivian Vosburg, EMEC at IPC  (708)509-9700 X377

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 15:23 CST
From: Nanci Baggett <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: fwd: IPC & MIL-STD specs

I can reply on some of the specs you are concerned with.  The information I 
have was obtained from DESC back in June of this year.  Contact Desc and 
request an update to the status of what is referred to as "HOT 62".  This is a 
list of mil specs up for review to determine to keep, replace or delete.

Mil-Q-9858      Inactive for new design with changes to DFARS and cancel in     
            October 1996

Mil-STD-105     Cancelled by NOTICE 1 dated Feb. 27, 1995.  Future acquisitions 
                should refer to sampling procedures such as ANSI/ASQC Z1.4-1993

Mil-STD 45662   Canceled by NOTICE 2 dated Feb. 27, 1995.  Future acquisitions  
               should refer to ANSI/NCSL Z540-1, ISO 10012-1 or something       
          comparable. 

Hope this helps.
Nanci Baggett
Texas Instruments
[log in to unmask] 
-------------



ATOM RSS1 RSS2