TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jon Holmen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Nov 1995 14:40:25 -0600 (CST)
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (25 lines)


On Tue, 21 Nov 1995 [log in to unmask] wrote:

> For FIG 9-20, I feel there's a conflict between what's acceptable and what's a
> defect.  It says its a defect for Class 3 if the "base metal is exposed".
> However, just above that statement, listed Under Acceptable-Class 1,2,3 Item
> B, nicks, scrapes gouges, etc. are okay "not exceeding 25% of wire diameter".

The base metal exposed does refer to the terminal. The A-610 correction 
addendum will include the word "terminal" for the Class 3 Nonconforming 
condition.

****************************************************
Jon Holmen
Technical Project Manager
IPC
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook IL  60062-6135
Phone (708) 509-9700 ex329
Fax   (708) 509-9798
e-mail  [log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2