TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
IPC versus Mil-specs
From:
[log in to unmask][log in to unmask]>
To: MR DOUGLAS C JEFFERY <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Tin/lead plating vs HAL [...]39_Pine.3.89.9506211229.E46751-0100000@ipc0_0_
Date:
Tue, 1 Aug 95 09:27:56 MDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
Could someone from IPC respond to what is planned for the future regarding
migrating from military specs to IPC specs for rigid pwb's?

For example Mil-P-55110 and D-275

--------------------------------------
Larry L. Pucket
Sandia National Labs.
Dept. 2784  MS/0628
P.O. Box 5800
Albuquerque, NM 87185-0628

Email: [log in to unmask]
Phone: (505) 844-1711
Fax:   (505) 844-7428

ATOM RSS1 RSS2