TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Robert Blomstrom)
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 95 10:29:25 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
After reading the mail by Jamie Baumgart on Solid vs. Crosshatch fill areas 
I realized there is another area to consider.

I occasionally have customers who wish to have large areas on the SURFACE
of boards to serve as ground shields. 
Those large areas tend to have the same problems as internal areas AND
they also have the problem of poor reflow quality.
The solution is to convert the areas to crosshatch patterns which yields
much better quality boards. 
If the customer fears the crosshatch, then we try to pursude to go SMOBC to 
prevent the reflow problem, but are back to the problems of solid fill.

My concern however....
Does the crosshatch area actually achieve the ground shielding or does it
just act as a "screen door". 
What is the curve of grid width / line width vs shielding ?

If anyone can shed some light I would be grateful. 
--
Robert Blomstrom            Advanced Interconnection Technology, Inc. - Atlanta
Phone: 404-938-9387 x226    3289 Montreal Industrial Way, Tucker, Ga. 30084
fax:   404-934-9885         e-mail address: [log in to unmask]                 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2