Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
<gagme!austin.ibm.com!jworth> |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Apr 1995 16:28:17 -0500 (CDT) |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Thu Apr 25 15: |
23:16 1996 |
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"dIecC1.0.BN3.A6idl"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0s4F4O-0000GeC; Wed, 26 Apr 95 16:56 CDT |
X-Loop: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From: Jeff Worth - New Products Engineering
IBM PC Company
Austin, Texas 78758
(512) 838-5374
Dale,
It may be that the pads are not cleaned very well after HASL. Is there any
pattern or is it random? A pattern may indicate a cleaning problem, which
might lead to a thin residue of flux being left on certain areas of the
panel.
You, also may want to do a cross section on a few panels to see whats going
on with the intermetallics.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 95 15:35:49 MST
From:[log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: No clean process impacts
I have a question with regards to the no clean process: If I have a PCB .062"
thick with SMT pads that have been processed through the Hot Air Solder Level
process and the solder thickness readings are at 100f"or above; using a non-
activated flux, specifically, Rosin flux 25% water, 75% isopropyl alcohol. Why
do some pads during a solderability test wet and other pads directly next to it
do not? Any feedback on this would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Dale Panzero
|
|
|