TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
<gagme!austin.ibm.com!jworth>
Date:
Wed, 26 Apr 1995 16:28:17 -0500 (CDT)
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Thu Apr 25 15:
23:16 1996
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/434
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"dIecC1.0.BN3.A6idl"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0s4F4O-0000GeC; Wed, 26 Apr 95 16:56 CDT
X-Loop:
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (32 lines)
From: Jeff Worth - New Products Engineering	
      IBM PC Company
      Austin, Texas 78758
      (512) 838-5374
Dale,

It may be that the pads are not cleaned very well after HASL. Is there any
pattern or is it random? A pattern may indicate a cleaning problem, which 
might lead to a thin residue of flux being left on certain areas of the 
panel.
You, also may want to do a cross section on a few panels to see whats going
on with the intermetallics.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 95 15:35:49 MST
From:[log in to unmask]
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: No clean process impacts

I have a question with regards to the no clean process: If I have a PCB .062" 
thick with SMT pads that have been processed through the Hot Air Solder Level 
process and the solder thickness readings are at 100f"or above; using a non-
activated flux, specifically, Rosin flux 25% water, 75% isopropyl alcohol. Why 
do some pads during a solderability test wet and other pads directly next to it 
do not? Any feedback on this would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Dale Panzero




ATOM RSS1 RSS2