Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0sGVzb-0000GoC; Tue, 30 May 95 13:26 CDT |
Sender: |
|
Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!gac.usa.com!HYBISKE> |
Date: |
Tue, 30 May 1995 13:47:24 |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Fri Apr 26 13: |
51:19 1996 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"Z_ZQn3.0._v7.4Dsol"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
X-mhsfile: |
$T300948 |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would appreciate hearing from any board manufacturers concerning
the inclusion or exclusion of nonfunctional lands from internal planes
or signal layers. IPC-D-275 is vague on this (para 5.3.2.5) by
stating "should be included" rather than "shall". I've always
included unused pads on internal layers because I was told it aided
in the plating and support of the hole. I was recently asked by a
vendor to replace our traditional donuts on the plane layers to a
complete void (my guess was it would give them an additional .010
radius to work with). This precipitated a conversation about wether
we need unused pads on internal signal layers as well. How do you
feel about this?
Tom Hybiske
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|