TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0sGVzb-0000GoC; Tue, 30 May 95 13:26 CDT
Sender:
"TOM HYBISKE" <[log in to unmask]>
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!gac.usa.com!HYBISKE>
Date:
Tue, 30 May 1995 13:47:24
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/557
From [log in to unmask] Fri Apr 26 13:
51:19 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"Z_ZQn3.0._v7.4Dsol"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"TOM HYBISKE" <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
X-mhsfile:
$T300948
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
I would appreciate hearing from any board manufacturers concerning 
the inclusion or exclusion of nonfunctional lands from internal planes 
or signal layers.  IPC-D-275 is vague on this (para 5.3.2.5) by 
stating "should be included" rather than "shall".  I've always 
included unused pads on internal layers because I was told it aided 
in the plating and support of the hole.  I was recently asked by a 
vendor to replace our traditional donuts on the plane layers to a 
complete void (my guess was it would give them an additional .010 
radius to work with). This precipitated a conversation about wether 
we need unused pads on internal signal layers as well.  How do you 
feel about this?

                                    Tom Hybiske
                                    [log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2