Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tKALp-0000GlC; Mon, 27 Nov 95 14:40 CST |
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
<holmjo> |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Nov 1995 14:40:25 -0600 (CST) |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
cc: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
21:27 1996 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"DVN5c.0.p3F.-8Ykm"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<0015100001646989000004*@MHS> |
X-Loop: |
|
Message-ID: |
<Pine.3.89.9511271316.A79759-0100000@ipc> |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Nov 1995 [log in to unmask] wrote:
> For FIG 9-20, I feel there's a conflict between what's acceptable and what's a
> defect. It says its a defect for Class 3 if the "base metal is exposed".
> However, just above that statement, listed Under Acceptable-Class 1,2,3 Item
> B, nicks, scrapes gouges, etc. are okay "not exceeding 25% of wire diameter".
The base metal exposed does refer to the terminal. The A-610 correction
addendum will include the word "terminal" for the Class 3 Nonconforming
condition.
****************************************************
Jon Holmen
Technical Project Manager
IPC
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook IL 60062-6135
Phone (708) 509-9700 ex329
Fax (708) 509-9798
e-mail [log in to unmask]
|
|
|