 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tFlw1-0000IJC; Wed, 15 Nov 95 11:47 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!zycon.com!dmitchel> |
| Date: |
Wed, 15 Nov 95 08:41:21 PST |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
17:38 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"JK_NE1.0.BEF.QUYgm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
get in touch with Hal Brown @ Zycon Corporation @ 408.241.9900
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Double Treated Copper vs. Standard (Not Black) Oxide(s)
Author: [log in to unmask] at corp
Date: 11/13/95 12:45 PM
Does anybody out there have (or know of) any technical reports
or articles that reference peel strengths on polyimide of double treat
vs. standard (reduced, brown, converted, white (tin) or red) oxide??
I know that the double treated copper has a topology that produces a
more desirable adhesion/bond interface.
Thanks in advance for any and all responses.
Hadco Printed Circuits
Tech Center Two / Watsonville
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/
_/_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/
_/_/ _/ _/_/ _/_/
_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/_/
Dave Hoover (408) 728-6677 Senior Process Engineer (408)
728-1728 Fax [log in to unmask]
|
|
|
