TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]> <miso!nando.net!evaltine>
Date:
Tue, 3 Oct 1995 17:01:17 -0400 (EDT)
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1269
TO:
IPC TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"ZPenq3.0.5YG.RtQSm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Evaltine <[log in to unmask]>
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0t0F5F-0000HTC; Tue, 3 Oct 95 16:41 CDT
X-Loop:
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14:
59:28 1996
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (18 lines)
ANSI/J-STD-001 and other specifications require ionic contamination 
levels of less than 1.56 micrograms/cm2 (10.06 micrograms/in2).  This is 
a reasonable level for overall ionic contamination on Class 3 PCBA's, and 
is a good maximum level for monitoring the cleaning process.  But, what 
about maximum levels for Class 1 (Consumer) and Class 2 (Industrial) 
grade PCBA's ?  Afterall, there are different levels for rosin residues.

Does anyone have ACCEPTABLE (maximum) levels for ionic contamination on 
Class 1 and Class 2 PCBA's ?  Thanks . . .

Ed Valentine ([log in to unmask])
ProTronics, Inc.
Knightdale, NC
Phone: (919) 217-0007, FAX: (919) 217-0050
******************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2