TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0szmQP-0000H7C; Mon, 2 Oct 95 10:05 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]> <miso!smtplink.dsccc.com!geiland>
Date:
Mon, 02 Oct 95 10:02:00 CST
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1263
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"g5ezO2.0._yF.4-_Rm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"GEILAND" <[log in to unmask]>
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14:
59:09 1996
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)

Does anyone have experience implementing a No-clean process on 
100% through hole product?  Is it possible?  What are the 
limitations/issues?  Is ICT a problem?

Thanks 

Gary Eiland
[log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2