TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0syQpx-0000GZC; Thu, 28 Sep 95 16:49 CDT
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]> <holmjo>
Date:
Thu, 28 Sep 1995 16:49:19 -0500 (CDT)
Precedence:
list
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14:
54:27 1996
cc:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1246
TO:
Richard Boerdner <[log in to unmask]>
Return-Path:
X-Status:
Resent-Sender:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"HtRPq3.0.XvC.bXnQm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Jon Holmen <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
In-Reply-To:
Resent-From:
Message-ID:
<Pine.3.89.9509281653.J28025-0100000@ipc>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (35 lines)
There is no percentage. Pinholes are acceptable providing that the solder 
connection meets the minimum requirements for wetting action in table 4-1.

In other words if there are so many pinholes that the solder volume is 
reduced below what table 4-1 specifies, it is nonconforming.


****************************************************
Jon Holmen
Technical Project Manager
IPC
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook IL  60062-6135
Phone (708) 509-9700 ex329
Fax   (708) 509-9798
e-mail  [log in to unmask]
*****************************************************


On Thu, 28 Sep 1995, Richard Boerdner wrote:

> To clarify IPC-A-610A Section 4.2 Table 4-1. We are unclear on what 
> percentage of pin holes are allowable on supported holes.
> 
> Please help !
> 
> Please respond ASAP
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> 
> 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2