Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0syQpx-0000GZC; Thu, 28 Sep 95 16:49 CDT |
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 Sep 1995 16:49:19 -0500 (CDT) |
Precedence: |
list |
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
54:27 1996 |
cc: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"HtRPq3.0.XvC.bXnQm"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
Message-ID: |
<Pine.3.89.9509281653.J28025-0100000@ipc> |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
There is no percentage. Pinholes are acceptable providing that the solder
connection meets the minimum requirements for wetting action in table 4-1.
In other words if there are so many pinholes that the solder volume is
reduced below what table 4-1 specifies, it is nonconforming.
****************************************************
Jon Holmen
Technical Project Manager
IPC
2215 Sanders Road
Northbrook IL 60062-6135
Phone (708) 509-9700 ex329
Fax (708) 509-9798
e-mail [log in to unmask]
*****************************************************
On Thu, 28 Sep 1995, Richard Boerdner wrote:
> To clarify IPC-A-610A Section 4.2 Table 4-1. We are unclear on what
> percentage of pin holes are allowable on supported holes.
>
> Please help !
>
> Please respond ASAP
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
|
|
|