TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0stFHz-0000HDC; Thu, 14 Sep 95 09:29 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<[log in to unmask]> <miso!mail.prodigy.com!TCGE34A>
Date:
Thu, 14 Sep 1995 06:27:57 EDT
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/1132
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"Aauel3.0.0o8.Zm3Mm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (MR DOUGLAS C JEFFERY)
X-Loop:
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14:
48:25 1996
X-Mailer:
PRODIGY Services Company Internet mailer [PIM 3.2-342.56]
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
-- [ From: Doug Jeffery * EMC.Ver #2.10P ] --

On 9/8/95 Karl Sauter Wrote:

>Does there remain any reason to have thermal reliefs on vias (ie:
drilled hole size less than 0.016" diameter) ?

Karl,

We see between 10 and 30 new designs a week come in and I estimate that
30 to 40% of those do not have thermal relief on the via sizes.  This
design is being used by my customers and I have not hear any negative
feed back.  

I have not seen this used on technologies using more than 2 power and
ground planes, although I don't know why it would not apply there also.

Doug Jeffery
Electrotek




ATOM RSS1 RSS2