Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0ss9TZ-0000GoC; Mon, 11 Sep 95 09:04 CDT |
Encoding: |
1319 Text |
Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!hadco.com!tcoyle> |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Sep 95 19:29:50 EST |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"77oTf.0.eBA.y74Lm"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
45:18 1996 |
X-Loop: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Karl:
You hit the nail on the head about the non-necessity of
thermal reliefs on small hole (,.015" dia.) vias. HADCO as
well as many other shops employ a post-oxide dip for the
elimination of pink ring. Even so, pink ring was probably
not a real quality issue anyway. IPC-RB-276 defines pink
ring in section 3.2.2: "A zone around a through
hole/internal layer interface from which the oxide coating
on the copper has been discolored or chemically removed."
It goes on to state in section 3.6.2.3: "No evidence exists
that pink ring affects functionality. The presence of
excessive pink ring may be considered an indicator of
process or design variation but is not a cause for
rejection. The focus of concern should be the quality of
the lamination bond." If not adding thermal reliefs on
small hole vias makes life easier for you, I say go ahead
and do it. From a bareboard standpoint, you will not be
compromising anything.
Tom Coyle
Field Services Engineer
HADCO Corporation
[log in to unmask]
"The views represented above ARE those of my employer."
|
|
|