TECHNET Archives

January 2020

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Jan 2020 07:27:05 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Hi Bev - the statement standing alone is out of context so it could mean a
bunch of things. You would need to know the solder joint configuration and
the what the X/Y/Z stress states to have the sentence make sense. I am
assuming that the report from which the statement was taken would provide
that information.

Dave Hillman
Collins Aerospace
[log in to unmask]

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 7:50 PM Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> TechNetters,
>
>
>
> Can someone interpret this sentence for me?
>
> "As Sn is anisotropic, the size and orientation of the grain structure
> contributes to CTE mismatch fractures along the larger axis of a solder
> joint, laterally rather than vertically."
>
>
>
> I know the following:
>
> 1.      Sn is anisotropic
> 2.      the size and orientation of the grain structure contributes to CTE
> mismatch fractures
>
> Is the latter part (.along the larger axis of a solder joint, laterally
> rather than vertically.) always true and if so, why?  What am I missing?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Bev
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2