As I suspected and just need to be completely certain.
Thanks Doug.
Rich Kraszewski
Senior Staff Process Engineer
Phone: (920) 969-6075
* * * * * * * * CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE * * * * * * * *
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential from Plexus Corp. and may contain information which is privileged, confidential, and/or protected by non-disclosure agreements. They are intended solely for the use of the named addressee(s). . Any unauthorized use or disclosure may be unlawful. If you are not a named addressee, you must not use, disclose, retain or reproduce all or any part of the information contained in this e-mail or any attachments If you have received this transmission in error, please destroy it and notify us immediately by return e-mail or by calling + 1 888 208 9005.
From: Douglas Pauls [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 3:32 PM
To: TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: [External] [TN] IPC CC -830 & the QPL
[EXTERNAL] This email was sent from outside of Plexus. Use caution when opening attachments or links from unknown senders.
.
Good afternoon Rich.
1. Correct. MIL-I-46058 is inactive for new designs, but not cancelled. DSCC maintains the QPL. Any vendor can qualify a new coating if it falls into one of the five existing chemical families.
2. For CC-830, yes, you would have to get the test report and verify yourself that the test data meets the CC-830 requirements and that ALL of the CC-830 tests have been passed. There was discussion a few years back of IPC being a certifying authority for in essence, a commercial QPL, but the idea met with much resistance, but not perhaps to the level of rioting villagers you describe.
Douglas Pauls | Principal Materials and Process Engr | Advanced Operations Engineering
COLLINS AEROSPACE
400 Collins Road NE, MS 108-101, Cedar Rapids, IA 52498 USA
Tel: +1 319 295 2109 | Mobile: +1 319 431 3773
[log in to unmask]<http://collins.com>
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> for all Export Compliant Items
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 3:20 PM Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
So I realize this or a related question comes up each year on Technet and likely this has come up at committee meetings but here it goes again:
1. While IPC WP-21 indicates that the QPL will not update to "new Technology" (IE., UT & SC) it is still active for the original classes (AR, UR, SR, etc), CORRECT?
(With the ability to qualify new products to those previous/historical coating classes)
2. For IPC CC 830 about the only choice one has to confirm that a coating meets the requirements of CC830 is to get a copy of the test report & data from the manufacturer CORRECT?
OTHER than running the testing yourself correct.
(I seem to recall a failed attempt ~5 years ago by the IPC to create their own CC830 classification list and service. If memory serves me correctly, that idea was received with "pitchforks, buckets of hot tar and burning torches" and died a quick death).
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Rich Kraszewski
Senior Staff Process Engineer
Phone: (920) 969-6075
* * * * * * * * CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE * * * * * * * *
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential from Plexus Corp. and may contain information which is privileged, confidential, and/or protected by non-disclosure agreements. They are intended solely for the use of the named addressee(s). . Any unauthorized use or disclosure may be unlawful. If you are not a named addressee, you must not use, disclose, retain or reproduce all or any part of the information contained in this e-mail or any attachments If you have received this transmission in error, please destroy it and notify us immediately by return e-mail or by calling + 1 888 208 9005.
|
