TECHNET Archives

January 2020

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joe Russeau <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:53:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (122 lines)
I would add to this conversation by saying that we have tested
power-free nitrile and powder-free vinyl gloves using ion chromatography
for "ionic" contaminates.  We analyze the lots of gloves we use to
handle customer product to ascertain the types and amounts of ionics
that we may be contributing to the test results.  We have typically
found that gloves of those types have very low levels of ionic
contaminates (less than 1.5 ppm total for a pair of gloves anions and
cations combined).  Couple low ionic levels with proper handling
techniques and you can minimize the chance for transference to a
product.  

That all said, I can't speak to the relative amounts of contaminates
coming from ESD mats.  Until this past year, ESD mats haven't really
been on anyone's radar for being a corrosion contributor.  Now there
seems to be a lot of questions being asked about the levels of
contaminates coming from mats and do those contaminates lead to
corrosion products.  To date, I am not personally aware of any standard
that defines what contaminate levels ought to be for mats.  Perhaps some
guidance is needed.  My 2 cents would when in doubt have those materials
tested, if for nothing else but peace of mind.   

Best Regards, 

Joe Russeau 

PAL, Inc.

On 2020-01-14 10:55, David Hillman wrote:

> Hi team - I'll just add a couple of comments to the conversation. The
> tarnish typically found on immersion silver board finishes is the result of
> boards being wet/damp from processing which leads to a brown/black visual
> tarnish due to reactions with the air. The majority of the time the tarnish
> is cosmetic and does not impact the solderability of the board. If it is
> not cosmetic then you will find the solderability is a problem pretty
> easily.  The gloves we use are not sulfur free - they are Micro Grip
> nitrile gloves from VWR International (part number 40101-350) and we
> haven't seen an issue with them causing tarnishing. Of course, everyone
> should be handling a board by its edges as much as possible too. I would
> look at your board storage and handling practices as possible root cause
> sources for the tarnishing. Good luck.
> 
> Dave Hillman
> Collins Aerospace
> 
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 7:42 AM Douglas Pauls <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> "Last Century"?  Thanks for turning me from old to ancient Bev.
> 
> As Bev indicated, there are no standards in our industry for this kind of
> thing.  The recommended ionic levels from Foresite, PAL, or other test labs
> are for circuit assemblies or bare circuit boards, not for amounts in
> gloves.  We use standard latex or nitrile gloves here and a lot of what we
> use is immersion silver.  We have not seen the need for special gloves.
> 
> In terms of functional impact, if it is just tarnish, then there is no
> functional impact.  Silver oxide conducts as well as pure silver.  All you
> have is a cosmetic issue when people collectively lose their minds looking
> at tarnished silver.
> 
> I suspect what happened is somebody somewhere thought "sulfur is bad for
> silver" (which it is), "so we need sulfur free gloves" (which you don't).
> 
> *Douglas Pauls *| Principal Materials and Process Engr | Advanced
> Operations Engineering
> 
> *COLLINS AEROSPACE*
> 
> 400 Collins Road NE, MS 108-101, Cedar Rapids, IA  52498  USA
> 
> *Tel:* +1 319 295 2109 | *Mobile: *+1 319 431 3773
> 
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> [log in to unmask] for all Export Compliant Items
> 
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 7:31 AM Bev Christian <[log in to unmask]:
> 
> First, do you like to be call GA or Tan?
> a) & b) There are no standards. Shoot, we don't have any "official"
> standards for sodium, potassium, fluoride, chloride, bromide, nitrate,
> nitrate, phosphate or sulfate; unless they are in IEC standards that I
> don't
> know about.  We have the suggestions of Doug and Terry from the last
> century
> and those from Delco and a couple of other sets.
> Certainly the measurement of Doug Pauls, etc. are professionally carried
> out.
> c) Only cosmetic
> 
> I have never heard anyone ask for sulfur free gloves. I am not aware of
> what
> is available. I would start with asking a VWR or Fisher rep (large chemical suppliers with extensive catalogues) .
> 
> Regards,
> Bev
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Tan Geok Ang
> Sent: January 14, 2020 6:34 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Need advice : sulphur level on Gloves/ESD mat and reference
> standards
> 
> Will really appreciate advice on the following;
> 
> a) how much of sulphur/calcium, etc. on gloves/ESD Mat is acceptable and
> what level is considered harmful in handling of PCBA/module with sliver
> plated surface
> 
> b) whether there are any "standards" or references for "compliance" check
> for sulphur, and is there such measurements professionally carried out
> 
> c) What will be the impacts on the PCBA when silver plating become tarnish? 
> 
> There are sulphur free gloves but it is not easily accessible/available in Singapore and it is expensive.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> GA Tan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2