such as some counterfeit part got into the system?  you don't have to  
answer...;-)
jk
On Jun 11, 2018, at 3:56 PM, David Hillman wrote:

> Hi Reuven - the purpose for the destructive test is not a short cut  
> around
> a full monitoring/reporting system, I have a different purpose for  
> needing
> the assessment.
>
> Dave
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Reuven Rokah  
> <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>> Shortcut is not the right way to monitor the REACH-SVHC 181  
>> substances.
>> You should data collect from each parts / Mfrs the SVHC details  
>> and FMD
>> data.
>>
>> נשלח מה-iPhone של ראובן רוקח
>>
>> ב-11 ביוני 2018, בשעה 17:00, ‏‏Bev Christian ‏ 
>> <[log in to unmask]>
>> כתב/ה:‬
>>
>>> Dave,
>>> I would start with
>>> www.claigan.com/contact/
>>> Claigan Environmental Inc. 4043 Carling Avenue, Suite 120.  
>>> Kanata, ON
>> K2K 2A4 Canada. Phone: +1 (613) 599-4444. Sales: +1 (613) 853-5271
>>>
>>> However, REACH testing can be VERY expensive.  You need to focus  
>>> on the
>> chemicals that are the most likely to be present.  The most likely  
>> culprits
>> are phthalates.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Bev
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of David Hillman
>>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 9:48 AM
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: [TN] REACH Compliance
>>>
>>> Hi team! Hey, I am looking for laboratories who can take a printed
>> circuit assembly and conduct a destructive REACH compliance  
>> assessment.
>> Please shoot me an off line email with any suggested resources you  
>> would
>> recommend.
>>>
>>> TIA
>>>
>>> Dave Hillman
>>> Rockwell Collins
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>