such as some counterfeit part got into the system? you don't have to answer...;-) jk On Jun 11, 2018, at 3:56 PM, David Hillman wrote: > Hi Reuven - the purpose for the destructive test is not a short cut > around > a full monitoring/reporting system, I have a different purpose for > needing > the assessment. > > Dave > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Reuven Rokah > <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >> Hi David, >> Shortcut is not the right way to monitor the REACH-SVHC 181 >> substances. >> You should data collect from each parts / Mfrs the SVHC details >> and FMD >> data. >> >> נשלח מה-iPhone של ראובן רוקח >> >> ב-11 ביוני 2018, בשעה 17:00, Bev Christian >> <[log in to unmask]> >> כתב/ה: >> >>> Dave, >>> I would start with >>> www.claigan.com/contact/ >>> Claigan Environmental Inc. 4043 Carling Avenue, Suite 120. >>> Kanata, ON >> K2K 2A4 Canada. Phone: +1 (613) 599-4444. Sales: +1 (613) 853-5271 >>> >>> However, REACH testing can be VERY expensive. You need to focus >>> on the >> chemicals that are the most likely to be present. The most likely >> culprits >> are phthalates. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Bev >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: TechNet <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of David Hillman >>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 9:48 AM >>> To: [log in to unmask] >>> Subject: [TN] REACH Compliance >>> >>> Hi team! Hey, I am looking for laboratories who can take a printed >> circuit assembly and conduct a destructive REACH compliance >> assessment. >> Please shoot me an off line email with any suggested resources you >> would >> recommend. >>> >>> TIA >>> >>> Dave Hillman >>> Rockwell Collins >>> [log in to unmask] >>