TECHNET Archives

April 2018

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: A Fungus Nutrient Question
From:
"Stadem, Richard D" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D
Date:
Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:24:35 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines) 
Hi, Dave

I am referring you to NTS.       https://www.nts.com/services/testing/environmental/fungus/

They have a lot of knowledge in the subject and can probably answer your questions.

I urge you to contact them for information. GD has used them before, and I can attest they are a bunch of fun guys! 

Odin



-----Original Message-----

From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Hillman

Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 5:04 PM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: [TN] A Fungus Nutrient Question



Hi team! Looking for TechNet's sage wisdom. Some folks are familiar with this but many electronic modules have a "shall not be a fungus nutrient material"  in terms of the components materials, laminate materials, etc. I was asked the question if "properly reflowed flux materials are classified as non-fungus nutrient supporting". Does anyone have an knowledge/data on properly reflowed flux residue being "non fungus nutrient supporting"?



TIA



Dave Hillman

Rockwell Collins

[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2