TECHNET Archives

September 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, David Hillman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:20:52 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Hi  GA Tan - nope, the WVR should not be higher than the TML unless someone
is re-writing physics. Possible issues could be; (1) incorrectly
measurement/procedure; (2) loss of an outgassing product in the sample that
is not being accounted for. Correctly testing and measuring moisture weight
loss is not a simple task, it takes a very rigid procedure to obtain valid
numbers.

Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Tan Geok Ang <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dear All,
>               Can WVR (water vapour regained) having a higher value than
> TML(total mass loss)? I told supplier's "NO" unless the testing might be
> done incorrectly at difference conditions.
>               Please do share with me, your thought. Thanks in advance.
>
> Best Regards
> GA Tan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2