That's another on on the "gotta try this" list.....
Doug Pauls
From: Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 01/10/2014 02:03 PM
Subject: Re: [TN] Help with a Term
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
DOINK distraction observed inspection (status) not known.
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Mikell
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 2:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Help with a Term
I think Chris is close with this one.
But I want to avoid anything that might create a reject bias.
Sooo...
How about POC mark, PoC = Point of Contention or PoD = Point of Debate or
FoD = Focus of Debate
Steve Mikell
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris BALL
Sent: 01/07/14 01:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Help with a Term
POK mark (possibly OK) -Chris
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________