That's another on on the "gotta try this" list..... Doug Pauls From: Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Date: 01/10/2014 02:03 PM Subject: Re: [TN] Help with a Term Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]> DOINK distraction observed inspection (status) not known. -----Original Message----- From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Mikell Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 2:58 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [TN] Help with a Term I think Chris is close with this one. But I want to avoid anything that might create a reject bias. Sooo... How about POC mark, PoC = Point of Contention or PoD = Point of Debate or FoD = Focus of Debate Steve Mikell [log in to unmask] ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris BALL Sent: 01/07/14 01:58 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: [TN] Help with a Term POK mark (possibly OK) -Chris ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________