TECHNET Archives

February 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:06:28 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Rich, you may be thinking of Table A-VI, on page 41 of MIL-PRF-55110 rev G amendment 3. If you don't have the spec, go to http://dodssp.daps.dla.mil/ . I think I've seen it other place(s), too. Louis Hart

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Richard Kraszewski
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 3:00 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Correlation Factors for ROSE Testing

While I realize that IPC specifically and the industry in general, does not support the use of ROSE correlation factors for the various testers, I have a need to see the official document that at one time quoted these specifically allowed factors.

I took a cursory look though all 230 pages of IPC TR 583 and didn't see that table. 

I seem to recall a military specification that had that table. Was it 454? 28809, 2000?

Does anyone recall?


Rich  Kraszewski / PLEXUS
 



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2