TECHNET Archives

July 2010

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Werner Engelmaier <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Jul 2010 21:30:22 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (180 lines)
 Hi Eldon,
I am surprised you ave not seen failures like these earlier.

 Also, did you perhaps switch to Pb-free solders?


 

My present theory is the crack occurs when the assembly is wave soldered 
causing excessive tension on the resistor due to CTE mis-match, and some of 
these crack. 

 

Sorry, but this is wrong. On heating the PCB expands more than the CC—no cracking.


But when the board comes back to ambient it seems to be 
longer, and shows a gap.

On cooling, the PCB shrinks more, putting the CC, solder joints and all in tension—causes cracking and gaps.


After a board goes through 3 heat cycles at a CM, 
wouldn't it be stable in CTE?

No, there is no 'stabilization' of CTE's.


And why would the other resistor not have the 
same issue?  Is CTE different in X and Y? 

There are differences in CTE in x and y—by sometimes more than 2 ppm/C. The loading is also different if running parallel or perpendicular to the wave

Finally, would an error or change in 
the raw fab process cause a change in the CTE and cause this issue to occur 
after many years?


Obviously, something has changed—you need to find out what.

Werner





 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Eldon Sanders <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Fri, Jul 2, 2010 7:31 pm
Subject: [TN] Cracked 2208 smt resistor end joint


We are experiencing fractures in the end metallization or solder joint on one of 



two larger high voltage resistors, size 2208.  They are mounted on FR-4.    

Only one location is failing.  The other location is an inch away and oriented 

at 

90 degrees.  The failure rate is variable between assembly lots.  Some have 

no failures, and no observed cracks.  The most recent lot has a 2% failure 

rate, and another 2% that exhibit visible cracks in the ceramic but the solder 

joint is connecting the pad to the metallization and making electrical 

connection.  I believe the root cause is the poor choice of the FR-4 board 

material with such a large ceramic resistor.  However, about 80,000 boards 

have been built over 7 years without this failure mode.  So, I am searching for 

the root cause of this specific timeframe.  I have verified the process at the 

CM has not changed - the resistor is mounted on the 2nd pass SMT, and the 

board goes through wave soldering of TH components using a fixture.  The 

same date code resistor is used for both good assembly lots and bad.  There 

is some correlation to the date code of the bare fab.  On cracked boards 

there is a gap observable between the solder joint and the ceramic resistor 

body.  



My present theory is the crack occurs when the assembly is wave soldered 

causing excessive tension on the resistor due to CTE mis-match, and some of 

these crack.  But when the board comes back to ambient it seems to be 

longer, and shows a gap.  After a board goes through 3 heat cycles at a CM, 

wouldn't it be stable in CTE?  And why would the other resistor not have the 

same issue?  Is CTE different in X and Y?  Finally, would an error or change in 

the raw fab process cause a change in the CTE and cause this issue to occur 

after many years?



Thanks to all the incredible minds if TechNet.



Eldon Sanders 

Sr. Manufacturing Engineer 

Welch Allyn Monitoring 

8500 SW Creekside Place

Beaverton, OR 97008-7107

phone: (503) 530-7596         fax: (503) 526-4300

[log in to unmask]



---------------------------------------------------

Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0

To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in

the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet

To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to 

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)

To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to 

[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest

Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives

Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for 

additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 

847-615-7100 ext.2815

-----------------------------------------------------


 

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2