Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 7 Mar 2010 04:35:42 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello All,
I'm working on the design of high speed line card for our high-end network router and plan to use buried capacitance to improve electrical performance.
As known, both ZBC2000 and the next generation ultra-thin buried capacitance materials(3M C-Ply, FaradFlex BC24/BC16/BC12/BC16T) have advantages and disadvantages, respectively. To consider PCB manufacturing, PCB reliability, PCB cost, PCB lead-free assembly, and electrical perforance improvement, what kind of buried capacitance material is the best choice for high speed datacom products. Thanks a lot.
Best Regarads
Charming Chan
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|