Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:53:55 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Toby,
For HDI designs (via in pad) I pour ground underneath BGAs and ensure that
any connections to the BGA ball are thermals. This eliminates soldermask
defined land areas which are problematic during manufacture.
For most non-HDI designs your observation is correct - there's not likely a
lot of pour under the BGA anyways, so not much point in having it there, and
I'll normally block out the area if pouring on the surface. I do normally
employ a stackup where the adjacent layer (t-1, b-1) is a plane in these
situations. The one reason I would consider keeping the pour under the BGA
is if it is large enough (and required) to provide some thermal benefit.
Hth,
Dave
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|