TECHNET Archives

October 2008

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Paul Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:03:06 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
John,

Your assembly house should always give you a straight answer, like a plain and simple NO...

But as a contract assembly house building prototypes, NPI, pre-production and some limited production we are forced to build mixed metallurgy PCAs because our customers either supply the material, dictate what material to be used or the parts are only available in certain metallurgies...
Unfortunately this is the nature of building PCAs in the US because we are no longer the primary supplier of the devices we use in the products we build...

If reliability is the concern verses is it a RoHs PCA, then technically speaking, if the assembler used SnPb paste on a SAC305 ball the concern should be what was resultant joint alloy composition... From that you can determine the effect of the joints on the reliability of the product...
From all the data on all the PCAs I have ever built, in most cases, a completely collapsed reflowed mixed metallurgy joint will survive commercial applications...Normally the failures occur elsewhere and well before the  bulk of the mixed metallurgy solder joint fails....

I my humble opinion, because of the differences in the metallurgical and hydrodynamic properties between Pb-bearing and Pb-free solders and fluxes, mixed metal reports built on building and testing PCAs adds additional significant variables to the interaction that are not removable by numerical data analysis techniques... In other words, take the information as a guide not as the facts.... After all there is an IBM report that indicates that Pb-free solder fails faster than Pb-bearing solder in C4 components...


Paul 

Paul Edwards



-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Foster
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 8:21 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Lead Free BGA'S

Our assembly house recently assembled some boards with Lead Free BGA's for us
and when I asked them if they used a lead free process they responded with.

We use leaded solder (Sn63Pb37) with a hybrid oven profile to accommodate the lead-free BGA. I hope this answers your question. Please let me know if you have any more questions."
Is this a common process, is this a reliable process

Any input is appreciated

Thank You
John Foster


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

==============================================================================

This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and
privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying,
or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact [log in to unmask]
immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and
any attachments thereto. 

==============================================================================


---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2