DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

August 2007

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kitty Hines <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:53:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Hi,
I'm trying to revamp some of the spacing requirements that our
Manufacturing Dept. has decided upon and need some documented proof that
the spacing they "require" is unnecessary.  I tried to find specific
requirements in IPC-2221, but wasn't able to find them.  What I'd like to
find is spacing requirements for pad-to-pad, pad-to-trace, smd land-to smd
land.  I'd like to find requirements for solder wave and reflow processes.
Does anyone know what IPC spec I should be looking at?  Or a reliable
reference I can find?  These requirements would only take Manufacturing
rules into consideration, disregarding any electrical rules.
Thanks for any help you can be,
Kitty

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2