TECHNET Archives

March 2007

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Barmuta, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Barmuta, Michael
Date:
Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:01:14 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (120 lines)
Hi Amol: When evaluating a new supplier or introducing a new product
design we will monitor critical plating thickness.  Typically the
electroplated Cu thickness in the holes and Ni and Au min/max surface
thickness when applicable. 


Regarding electroplated deposits, please remember depending on where you
take the reading on the board can make a huge difference due to current
density variations. So some common sense and an understanding of
electroplating must be used when selecting measurement sites. 

 We will do a simple run chart for a dedicated part number. These run
charts will have a reference line(s) for either minimum thickness,
maximum thickness or both.

 We normally monitor on an as received basis for three months. During
that time if we are having problems we will contact the fabricator for
corrective action. Then continue to monitor for an additional three
months after the problem is resolved. This obviously can then go on and
on if plating problems keep cropping up, as it resets the three month
clock. Although we have found once they get the plating parameters
dialed in they stay pretty constant. 

Since we are continually creating new designs/products we are if effect
continuously monitoring their plating processes with each new release.  

You can escalate this up to control charts, statistical limits, standard
deviations, mean, XbarR, P, ad nauseam. Bottom line we are concerned
that the plating thickness meets our callout on the print. This is
normally a minimum plating thickness except were excessive electroplated
Au may be an issue. My advice is to keep it simple and understand what
is truly important to monitor. 


	
Regards
	
Michael Barmuta
	
Staff Engineer
	
Fluke Corp.
	
Everett WA
	
425-446-6076
	


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kane, Amol (349)
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 4:18 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] PCB plating Qualification

Dear Members,
Is anybody out there looking at statistical data (control charts, Cp,
Cpk values) of plating thicknesses processes for say, ENIG and
evaluating your board house/s on it? Are there any procedures (IPC or
otherwise) for doing so? what matrices can be reasonably achieved for
plating processes? If this analysis is looked it, is it just a one time
deal or is this a recurrent activity (like every 6 months or 1 year or
some other time period)

Wanted to know the general trend in the industry.

Thanks in advance,
Amol





CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This e-mail, and any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended 
recipient(s) and may contain information that is confidential and 
protected from disclosure under the law. Any unauthorized review, use, 
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail, and delete/destroy

all copies of the original message and attachments. 
Thank you.

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential 
and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee.  
Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on 
the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may 
constitute a violation of law.  If you are not the intended 
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to 
this e-mail, and delete the message from your system.  If you 
have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender 
immediately. 

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2