DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

July 2006

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Ball <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Designers Council Forum)
Date:
Wed, 5 Jul 2006 07:42:37 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
Routing under components will not (should not) be a concern for mfg.
quality. Some components shouldn't be routed under (a resonator or crystal,
for example). If the engineer (your customer) wants to see all the traces
easily, even if it adds many otherwise unrequired vias on a double-sided
board, what can you do but comply? Make a couple of pictures to illustrate
how much cleaner the design could be if routed freely and try to have a
discussion with the frowners.

For what it's worth, I've been routing between pads of caps and resistors
and whatnot since there's been SMT, mostly class 3 automotive applications.

BR,
-Chris (el CID)




                       Adam Smith
                       <[log in to unmask]>                 To:   [log in to unmask]
                       Sent by: DesignerCouncil          cc:
                       <[log in to unmask]>         Subject:    [DC] Routing under vias

                       07/04/2006 10:25 AM
                       Please respond to
                       "(Designers Council
                       Forum)"; Please respond to
                       Adam Smith







I'm just wondering what the general consensus is with routing under
components? In general my company has always frowned upon routing under
resistors and capacitors. I am working on a small 2 layer board and
would like to use the components as jumpers to limit the number of layer
changes for a few signals. Any thoughts?

Adam Smith, CID
IR Halifax
7020 Mumford Rd
Halifax NS B3L 4S9
902.431.1644 x262


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET
DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases >
E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------






"This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the intended
recipient(s).
The information contained therein may be confidential or privileged, and
its disclosure or reproduction is strictly prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please return it immediately to its
sender at the above address and destroy it."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2