LEADFREE Archives

May 2006

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pete Houwen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Tue, 9 May 2006 09:11:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
We have successfullly made the transtition, and are beginning to produce
complaint products.

And that's starting to drive the bean counters into a frenzy.  Our new PCB
material spec is calling for 330Td, non-dicy, Z-Axis max, etc... and guess
what, - it costs more than the old 140Tg material.  Now they want to go
back to the old material - throw out a year of research and testing -
because they ran a few boards using the old material.

The questions are - is anyone running lead free solder processes using the
old standard 140Tg, in any kind of volume, with any measurable quality?

How do you convince them that RoHS just costs more, but it will get cheaper
eventually?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2