LEADFREE Archives

May 2006

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"McGee, Mike (MN51)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Wed, 24 May 2006 08:23:45 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (186 lines)
We chose not to allow reballing for just that reason. Most manufactures
will not support reballed parts. If you do reball, make sure you can
test the parts before placing on the board. I know of a shop that was
having approx 25% fall-out of the part they were reballing. I didn't
work directly with them, so I don't have the details, but I heard a lot
about their pain. It was further justification to our management that we
made the right decision. I know several manufactures offer reball "kits"
but for a high-rel environment, I would weigh the risks very carefully
before going down the reball path.

-Mike McGee

-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Anslow, Phillip
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 4:33 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] Reball or not to reball

Loa,
My company was planning same strategy of reballing BGAs - in process of
reassessment in the light of following disclaimer from one major
supplier in
following link - see page 6.
http://www.xilinx.com/bvdocs/appnotes/xapp426.pdf
Extract for convenience: "Xilinx does not recommend reballing. Xilinx
parts
that are reballed will not be guaranteed by
Xilinx. A maximum of three reflow cycles are allowed."
Not sure if this is isolated or general across component suppliers.
Suggestions for high-rel welcome...
Regards,
Phil.

-----Original Message-----
From: ALLEN, LOA [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 22 May 2006 20:57
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] Reball or not to reball


               *** WARNING ***

This mail has originated outside your organization,
either from an external partner or the Global Internet.

     Keep this in mind if you answer this message.


John,

Thanks for the reply . . . you pretty much answered my question
regarding the BGAs.  We plan to replate/pre-tin the leaded comps because
of tin whiskers.  However, guess I was looking for some reassurance that
re-balling the BGAs was the best course of action to take & was
wondering what others are doing.

Also - thanks for being the voice of the silent majority with Pushback.

Loa

-----Original Message-----
From: John Burke [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 9:45 AM
To: '(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)'; ALLEN, LOA
Subject: RE: [LF] Reball or not to reball

HI Loa,

I will let others advise on the rest but you will have to re-ball those
BGA's if you are going to solder them using leaded solder.

There is a lot of published work, if you need examples ping me off line.

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Loa
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2006 9:22 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [LF] Reball or not to reball

Is there a consensus among the listserv on using Pb-free comps in a SnPb
assembly?

We are a U.S. OEM claiming exemption to the RoHS directive (design & mfr
of
data storage/transfer equipment with no current EU customers) and as
predicted, the supply of SnPb terminated components are drying up with
many
of the new design comps not even being offered in SnPb.  Based on the
published work of industry experts and monitoring of the IPC LF &
TechNET
listservs, we have decided to "hot solder dip" Pb-free SMT comps with
legs
and re-ball Pb-free BGAs (both with Sn~60/Pb~40); vastly increasing the
cost.  Our assemblies are very low volume (5 to 15pcs typ) with a large
mix
of complexity and assembly part numbers.

I have queried local contacts in similar industry/situations and
received
the deer-in-the-headlight stare.  I have sat through workshops
explaining
how uncertain the future is regarding varying interpretations of
reliability - I just thought I was confused before.

My Other Question: What is the opinion of the masses - are we doing our
product unjust harm in an attempt to maintain reliability?  We are
willing
to deal with the cost of re-plate/re-ball as long as performance and
reliability are unchanged.

TIA (not the dog)
Loa

------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
---Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks
send:
SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
---

------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
---Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks
send:
SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
---

********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV
1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks
send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2