LEADFREE Archives

May 2006

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
MA/NY DDave <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Mon, 22 May 2006 23:02:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Hi Werner, Joe, J-P, JohnB, IPC LF Listservers,

<I see the LF-reliability issues to be much more important on the PCB side
than the SJ side. Fortunately, it is the soldering processes that cause
the failures; thus, field failures should not significantly increase since
the failures should show up at functional testing/burn-in.>

I agree many will initially stick with their old laminates, so this will
be the first easy failure mechanism to root out. Yet it will still take
much data and consternations to change the laminate for most companies.
Some products will not and have not required a laminate change.

Werner as you know the majority of companies do not do burn in, so this
only applies to a select set of companies that desire long term
reliability.

Yours in Engineering, Dave
YiEngr, MA/NY DDave

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2