TECHNET Archives

March 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joe Russeau <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Joe Russeau <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:01:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (322 lines)
Hi Graham,

Would you please send me a copy of IEC 61189-5.

Best Regards,

Joe Russeau
E: [log in to unmask]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham Naisbitt" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: [TN] SIR spacing


> Joyce
>
> That is waaayyyy too sensible for a Friday!
>
> I would like to run the same here and share the results...
>
> ...and oh boy., a challenge to SIR Doug: Whilst Doug is absolutely correct
> that there are no prevailing standards or specifications, there are drafts
> awaiting publication notably IEC - The International Electro-Technical
> Commission INTERNATIONAL Standard IEC 61189-5. I can again send anyone a
> copy if they let me know.
>
> However, there is a huge amount of data published by the NPL and ourselves
> that not only show where the present specs are suspect but, the EU
Consortia
> that included NPL, Siemens and NMRC ran a round-robin test programme
showing
> excellent correlation of data between their 3 sites using 3 different
> measurement systems.
>
> You would not be left "high and dry".
>
> --
> Regards Graham Naisbitt
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
> GEN3 SYSTEMS LIMITED (Formerly Concoat Systems)
> Unit B2 Armstrong Mall
> Southwood Business Park
> Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 0NR
>
> Phone: +44 (0)12 5252 1500
> Fax: +44 (0)12 5252 1112
>
> www.gen3systems.com
>
>
>
>
> On 9/3/06 19:58, "Joyce Koo" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Doug, Grraham and all other gurus, Many thanks for all your help.  I
think I
> > am going to test both...new and old...jk (zap, zap)
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Douglas O. Pauls
> > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:15 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [TN] SIR spacing
> >
> >
> > Joyce,
> > For the new methods, it is not so much a case of obsolete or
insufficient
> > as they are not yet accepted, nor are any of the standards which call
out
> > such test methods revised to call out the new methods.  So, if you run
the
> > new test, you won't have criteria or a specification against which to
test.
> >
> > Doug Pauls
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >              Joyce Koo
> >              <[log in to unmask]
> >              COM>
To
> >              Sent by: TechNet          [log in to unmask]
> >              <[log in to unmask]>
cc
> >
> >
Subject
> >              03/09/2006 08:01          Re: [TN] SIR spacing
> >              AM
> >
> >
> >              Please respond to
> >              [log in to unmask]
> >                     om
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Excellent!  this is exactly what I am looking for.  Jack and Doug, is
any
> > possiblity to get access the proposed new test method as "review
version"?
> > Hate to run test ($$$) and find out it is "obsolete or insufficient" by
> > gurus (never argue with someone that is superior than me either
physically
> > or mentally..;-)
> >
> >                                           jk
> > ps: Doug, you are right, Sandia is a brickwall..either by phone or
e-mail..
> > I guess they finger it out I do not have million $s just look at the
phone
> > number..;-(
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Graham Naisbitt
> > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 6:21 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [TN] SIR spacing
> >
> >
> > Hi Joyce
> >
> > There is a new IPC-TM-650 2.6.3.7 spec due to be released soon that
> > introduces a far more relevant test protocol to help characterise a
process
> > rather than a single material (e.g. Flux).
> >
> > This includes a recommended bias of 5v based upon a gradient of 25v/mm.
The
> > reason for this is based upon science research led by the NPL that
showed
> > lower voltage actually increased the effects of electro-chemical
migration.
> >
> > The measurement voltage is also recommended to be at 5v with no reverse
> > bias.
> >
> > The purpose is to try and test under conditions that most accurately
> > reflect
> > what your product is doing in real life.
> >
> > Testing using the old standards may well yield unrealistic results. As a
> > further example, no-clean fluxes tested at 85/85 would be volatilised
off
> > the surface at this elevated temperature. New recommendations now under
> > consideration are to test no-cleans at 40C/93RH - that way we can better
> > see
> > if there are any ECM issues.
> >
> > The dielectric withstand in CC-830 requires the coating to be tested to
> > TM-650 2.5.7.1 and "there shall be no disruptive discharge evidenced by
> > flash-over (surface discharge), sparkover (air discharge) or breakdown
> > (puncture discharge). The leakage rate shall not exceed 10
microamperes."
> >
> > I hope this helps
> >
> > --
> > Regards Graham Naisbitt
> >
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
> > GEN3 SYSTEMS LIMITED (Formerly Concoat Systems)
> > Unit B2 Armstrong Mall
> > Southwood Business Park
> > Farnborough, Hampshire GU14 0NR
> >
> > Phone: +44 (0)12 5252 1500
> > Fax: +44 (0)12 5252 1112
> >
> > www.gen3systems.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/3/06 19:49, "Joyce Koo" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear SIR,
> >> could you kindly provide the update info regarding the maximum bias for
> > the
> >> conformal coating SIR test?  Is it still 333 V/mm?  assume I use read
out
> > at
> >> 100 Vdc and bias at 50 Vdc for the B-25A, am I right that bias max is
> >> 333V/mm and read out is at 666V/mm spacing?  Thank you very much.
> >> Best regards,
> >>                        jk
> >> ps.  I know Concoat recommend low voltage bias, but the current test
> > method
> >> 650-2.6.3.4 is still high voltage.  (50Vdc bias)... by the way, anyone
> > has
> >> table regarding the dielectric withstanding voltage per IPC-CC-830?
Many
> >> thanks.)
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------
> >> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> >> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
> >> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> >> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> >> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> >> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> >> [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> >> Search the archives of previous posts at:
> > http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> >> Please visit IPC web site
> > http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> > for
> >> additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> >> 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> >> -----------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
> > the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> > To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> > [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> > To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> > [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> > Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> > Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> > for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
> > 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
> > the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> > To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> > [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> > To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> > [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> > Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> > Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> > for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
> > 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
> > the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> > To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> > [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> > To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> > [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> > Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> > Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
> > for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask]
or
> > 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
> > the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> > To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
> > [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> > To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
> > [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> > Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> > Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for
> > additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
> > 847-615-7100 ext.2815
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
> To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
> To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
> Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
> Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or
847-615-7100 ext.2815
> -----------------------------------------------------
>

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2