TECHNET Archives

March 2006

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kane, Joseph E (US SSA)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Kane, Joseph E (US SSA)
Date:
Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:16:53 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
"ID" - DP

There are a lot of issues to consider, like how easy
the flux is to remove, how effective the cleaning process is,
and what kind of flux traps are present in the design.
So you have to test.

J-STD-001 gives you the goods.  In Rev. C it's 
Appendix B, and in Rev. D it's Appendix C.

When we qualified our process, we performed SIR
and ion chromatography, plus a few other things.

Joe Kane
BAE Systems
Johnson City, NY


-----Original Message-----
From: Donald Vischulis [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 5:59 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Cleaning Qualification Question


All

I've been assigned the task of determining if a supplier's current
cleaning process is robust or if additional testing is required to be
able to say that the product is clean enough to provide years of field
use.  The board is a 2-sided Class 3 assembly (95% SMT) with one BGA and
about 1500 other components. The assembly is soldered with a water
soluble flux, it's cleaned in a batch cleaner with DI water, and is
conformal coated.  The current manufacturer is using and Omega meter to
verify the cleanliness of the board after cleaning.

My questions:

Is this process good enough to provide a reliable product in an aircraft
application?
If not what guidance is available to determine what level of process
qualification is needed to answer question #1?

Any help is really appreciated.

Don Vischulis

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text
in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to
[log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at:
http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site
http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100
ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8e
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2