LEADFREE Archives

October 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Phil Nutting <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:13:35 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/related
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1371 bytes) , Notebook.jpg (3028 bytes)
Here is my question for the afternoon,
 
I know the answer is "it depends", but I need some more information to
help with the decision process.
 
I just took delivery of a new wave solder machine set up for SAC 305.  I
have not yet purchased solder or flux.
 
Our CM is using Sn100C.  I know Sn100C is less expensive than SAC 305
(the IPC alloy of choice).
 
Is there going to be a long term issue if Sn100C and SAC 305 get mixed
together via hand soldering?
 
Is the Sn100C process more forgiving than that of SAC 305?
 
Are there fluxes out there that work better in a foam application?
 
I'd like to figure this out before ordering 600 pounds of bar solder.
 
Thanks in advance,
 
Phil Nutting

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


ATOM RSS1 RSS2