IPC-600-6012 Archives

April 2005

IPC-600-6012@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Green, Mike" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Combined Forum of D-33a and 7-31a Subcommittees)
Date:
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 09:32:19 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (65 lines)
We also take the following exceptions:

FINAL FINISH PLATING MAY EXTEND .010 INCH MAXIMUM UNDER THE EDGE OF THE SOLDER MASK, BUT SOLDER MASK IS NOT PERMITTED ON TERMINATION AREAS.

Instead of:

3.5.4.7.2 Tin-Lead under SMOBC
Tin or Tin Lead under SMOBC on areas not to be soldered is permitted on 1% of the conductor surfaces for Class 3 and 5% of the conductor surfaces for Class 1 and 2.

Because:

Solder is not the only finish that is affected.
Termination areas need to be excluded.
The issues are generally relegated to the edges of the solder mask.

Mike Green
Production Design Engineering
Lockheed Martin Space Systems
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
office  408-743-1635
Synergy works at LMC.  "Show me the data."
Won company, Juan team, One process, Un slogan, 1 badge, I goal, Ein mind, Aleph idea

-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of John Perry
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 9:05 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [IPC-600-6012] Proposed IPC-6012B Change for SnPb in SMOBC

Colleagues,

The IPC D-33a Rigid Board Performance Task Group is beginning the development of an Amendment 1 to IPC-6012 Revision B.  Relative to this is a request to modify and append text in section 3.5.4.7, Final Finish Coverage (Areas not to be soldered).

Background on change request:

A printed board was found to have small amounts of Tin Lead under the solder mask with reflow/SMOBC finish.  The part has been fabricated using the selective solder strip process.  The customer rejected the parts for small amounts of tin lead found on bare copper and under the solder mask, claiming with Tin Lead, the part no longer was Solder Mask over Bare Copper.  There is currently no IPC specification that prohibits such Tin Lead on the bare copper.  However, at some point it becomes a workmanship issue per IPC 6012B paragraph 3.3.9.

Rationale for change request:

This new accept/reject criteria provides a check and balance for the tin lead strip process (i.e., the process is not capable of absolute ZERO tin lead as there is always trace amounts on some circuits) and at the same time we don't want to be throwing away printed boards that are functionally fine.

Proposed Change within 3.5.4.7 of IPC-6012B:

3.5.4.7 Final Finish Coverage
Final finish shall meet the solderability requirements of J-STD-003.

3.5.4.7.1 Exposed Copper (Areas not to be soldered) Exposed copper on areas not to be soldered is permitted on 1% of the conductor surfaces for Class 3 and 5% of the conductor surfaces for Class 1 and Class 2.  Coverage does not apply to vertical conductor edges.

3.5.4.7.2 Tin-Lead under SMOBC
Tin or Tin Lead under SMOBC on areas not to be soldered is permitted on 1% of the conductor surfaces for Class 3 and 5% of the conductor surfaces for Class 1 and 2.

If you approve the proposed change without comment, please send your approval, by May 3rd, to [log in to unmask]  If there is a need to comment on and discuss this within the task group, please respond through this e-mail forum.

Thanks,

John Perry
Technical Project Manager
IPC
3000 Lakeside Drive # 309S
Bannockburn, IL 60015
[log in to unmask]
1-847-597-2818 (Phone)
1-847-615-7105 (Fax)
1-847-615-7100 (Main)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2