LEADFREE Archives

January 2005

Leadfree@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kay Nimmo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
(Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum)
Date:
Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:55:24 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (104 lines)
Just a note to anyone developing their own labels... that certain
designs are subject to copyright or other restrictions and it would be a
good idea to check that.

We certainly dont have any restrictions on the 'diamonds' in the
Soldertec document although I cant guarantee that someone else has not
protected a similar mark.

I will send the attachment files separately.

regards
Kay



-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of to Paul Taylor
Sent: 27 January 2005 12:43
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] RoHS Labelling again!







Ron, Irene and all

I think we have to remember that RoHS is not just 'lead free' its a
complete directive (like the CE mark). The IPC document is really aimed
at identifying the lead-free PCB assembly as a part of the finished
product.

k
Kay's soldertec document (which I've just downloaded) is very
informative and I think everyone on this forum at least should read and
return constructive views on (thanks to Kay for this) and out of this,
the diamond style labels look very interesting to me.  We are going to
review the use of this internally first before we 'make our own'.

As a personal review of the labels, i think example 2 has the most going
for it, this is the simple Green diamond shape with "RoHS 2002/95/EC"
inside.  It may be a  little confusing to some end users as to its use,
as some of the other label examples offer part exemptions.  However,
this may be useful in the future (for example, if you have cadmium
switch, which is now exempt, the unit is manufactured in accordance with
the RoHS but the cadmium would fall outside the permitted limits).  (ps
Kay: could you send me an image file of just the labels so I can do some
sample labels here?)

Anyway any of them if not all, would be relatively easy to adopt
worldwide, as everybody wants one!!. just remember...simple labels cos
not all of us are engineers.  Take the BSI kite mark, most of the
general public probably think is a warning symbol as its in a triangle
(like our road signs!!)

In response to Irena's mail, I'd like to say that all 'international'
labels have the same date of build issue, CE, UL etc labels don't have
the date that they are valid from, and yes the specification can change.
There would be no backward compatibility need as the supplier would
ensure that his new product met the ongoing requirements.  If we had
backwards comparability we'd be in product recalls all the time....not
cost effective!!!! and a nightmare to police.

regards

Paul


Paul R Taylor
Senior Engineer, Product Supply Group
Pitney Bowes Ltd
email: [log in to unmask]
website: www.pb.com


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tin Technology Ltd & ITRI Limited
Unit 3, Curo Park
Frogmore
St Albans
Hertfordshire, AL2 2DD

Phone number: +44 (0)1727 87 55 44
Fax number: +44 (0)1727 871 341
www.tintechnology.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This information given in this e-mail is for guidance only. It should be reproduced only in full, with no part taken out of context without prior permission. We believe the information provided in this statement and any attachments is reliable and useful, but it is furnished without warranty of any kind from the authors. 
Potential users should make their own determination of the suitability of any information provided and adopt any safety, health, and other precautions as may be deemed necessary by the user. 
No licence under any patent or other propriety rights is granted or to be inferred from the provision of the information herein. In no event will Tin Technology or any of its affiliates be liable for any damages whatsoever resulting from the use of or reliance upon this information.

The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. 
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by telephone on +44 (0)1727 87 55 44. Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2