Seems this may also apply to TV shows, movies, books, etc., shown in countries covered by RoHS or equivalents.
A line from an older movie, such as "I'll fill ya full of lead" will have to be replaced by "I'll fill ya with semi-solid metal-jacketed projectiles."
If there are any reruns of McHale's Navy, the nickname for Captain Binghamton would have to change from "Leadbottom" to "Brass Britches" or such...
Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of John Burke
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 5:35 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] Lead-free musical instruments
Yes indeed. In line with the policy of reducing hazardous substances the
European advisory committee recently made the following recommendations for
the music industry in reducing hazardous substances:
Led Zeplin - the LED level should be reduced and should not exceed 0.01% by
weight
Metallica - that the metal content in the aforementioned should fall in line
with the EEC requirements for cadmium, hexavalent chromium, lead and
mercury.
And as a general category, heavy metal should be within the limits of
percentage by weight as laid down in the legislation.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Whittaker, Dewey
(AZ75)
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 6:23 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] Lead-free musical instruments
What's next in Music? Are they going to take the Lead out of "Led Zeppelin"?
Dewey
-----Original Message-----
From: Leadfree [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Davy, Gordon
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 7:17 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LF] Lead-free musical instruments
Bareboard has asked whether I inferred from the Yamaha Music press release
regarding their line of lead-free musical instruments that an instrument
that contains traditional solder is harmful to the musician's health. The
only inference I can make from the press release is that Yamaha Music sees
some benefit to removing lead from their musical instruments and wants us to
infer that the benefit is to their customers more than to their bottom line.
If Bareboard's question is what my opinion is, my answer is that I think the
blood lead level for musicians using leaded musical instruments is no higher
than that of anyone else, and that it would be a huge challenge for someone
to propose a mechanism by which lead in a musical instrument could get into
the musician. Until someone presents some evidence, my inference on Yamaha's
motivation would be that it is an unprincipled attempt to increase market
share. They might be doing this by appealing to people's sense of "any move
to stop using lead is good for the environment" (with no notion of how the
environment is thereby made better) or else by exploiting fear. Remember
that the reasoning behind superstition is "it can't hurt, and it might
help." How much extra would you pay to protect yourself or your loved ones
from lead in the next musical instrument you buy?
Gordon Davy
Baltimore, MD
[log in to unmask]
410-993-7399
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree
To temporarily stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
